[2026:RJ-JP:20883] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8794/2026 Sedhuram S/o Late Shri Bhagawana, Resident Of Village And Post Kalyanpura Khurd, Tehsil Kotputli, Distt. Kotputli-Behror, (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The District Collector, District Kotputli-Behror, Rajasthan. 3. The S.d.o., Kotputli, District Kotputli-Behror. 4. The Tehsildar-Cum-Managing Officer (Custodian), Kotputli, District Kotputli-Behror, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mahesh Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. V.D. Gathala, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI Order 18/05/2026 1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking a direction to enter the name of the petitioner in Revenue record as per direction given by this court in SBCWP No.1878/1982 [Ishwar & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.] decided on 30.03.1993. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that this Court has subsequently also directed the authority to pass appropriate orders in respect of conferment of right of entries in the Revenue record and as such counsel refers order passed by this Court in SBCWP No. 2801/2007 [Sadhu Ram & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.] decided on 05.08.2008. 3. Learned counsel has further referred orders passed by this Court in SBCWP No.13958/2009 [Heeralal & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.] decided on 17.11.2009, SBCWP No.14794/2016 [2026:RJ-JP:20883] (2 of 2) [CW-8794/2026] [Leela Ram & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.] and other connected writ petitions decided by a common order dt.25.10.2017 and SBCWP No.6619/2015 [Kailash & Ors. Vs.State of Rajasthan & Ors.] decided on 19.11.2015. 4. This Court finds that earlier writ petitions decided by this Court has permitted the persons to approach the respondents and they were to submit fresh application and then the authorities were required to decide such representations by keeping in mind the order passed in the case of Ishwar & Ors. (supra) 5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents does not dispute the aforesaid legal position and submits that the petitioner is required to approach the authorities again by submitting fresh application. 6. The present writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to approach the respondents by filing a fresh application for conferment of their right and the respondents are directed to decide the said representation by keeping in mind the decision passed by this Court in SBCWP No. 1878/1982 [Ishwar & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.] (supra) and subsequent decisions. 7. In case, the petitioner file representation within a period of two weeks, the same may be decided by the respondents in expeditious manner but in no case later than six weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. 8. Stay applications and all application(s) (pending, if any) also stand disposed of (VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J SAURABH /42