Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 71247 (MAD)

NISHARDEEN @ NISHAR v. The State rep by its The Inspector of Police

CRL OP/3475/2026 · 2026-02-13

K Rajasekar

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 3475 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 13-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR CRL OP No. 3475 of 2026 Nishardeen @ Nishar S/o.Shakul Hameeth, No.106, Kottaipudur, Coimbatore. ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State rep by its The Inspector of Police D-1 Ramanathupuram Police Station, Coimbatore District. Crime No.145 of 2021. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: To enlarge the petitioner on bail in the above C.C.No.169 of 2022 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Coimbatore in Crime No.145 of 2021. For Petitioner(s): S.Senthilvel For Respondent(s): Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate(Crl. Side) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 3475 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 29.09.2025 for the alleged offence under Section 397 of IPC in Crime No.145 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 2. The petitioner was earlier arrested and released on bail. Subsequently, he jumped bail on 25.10.2023, and the Non Bailable Warrant was executed on 25.09.2025. Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner was arrested in connection with another case, hence he was not able to appear before the trial court in this case, and is ready to cooperate with the trial. Hence prayed for grant of bail. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the petitioner is having six previous cases, and there are six witnesses in this case, already two witnesses were examined, and the next hearing is posted for examination of other witnesses on 18.02.2026.Hence, he opposed to grant bail to the petitioner. 5. Considering the fact that the trial is already progressing and the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 3475 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 petitioner is also having six previous cases, and it is alleged that the petitioner was absconding for a substantial period, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 13-02-2026 MPA To 1. The State rep by its The Inspector of Police D-1 Ramanathupuram Police Station, Coimbatore District. Crime No.145 of 2021. 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 3475 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 K.RAJASEKAR, J. MPA CRL OP No. 3475 of 2026 13-02-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis