Pushpavalli Suresh Babhu v. Pearl Beach Plot Owners Welfare Association
CMP/3907/2026 · 2026-02-19
S Sounthar
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 71212 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 71212 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CMP No. 3907 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 19-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR CMP No. 3907 of 2026 in C.R.P.Sr.No.24232 of 2026 Pushpavalli Suresh Babhu ..Appellant(s) Vs
1. Pearl Beach Plot Owners Welfare Association Regn No.122/2018, Rep. by its Secretary, No.120, Paramankeni Village, Cheyyur Taluk, Chengalpattu District 603305.
2. M/s.Pearl Beach Rep. by its Proprietor, Dr.S.Mohamed Aslam, No.71/35, Armenian Street, 4th Floor, Parrys, Chennai 600001. ..Respondent(s) Prayer:- Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India r/w Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, pleased to grant leave to petitioner to file the present Civil Revision Petition challenging the
order passed in I.A.No.4 of 2024 in O.S.No.249 of 2024 dated 07.01.2026 on the file of Additional District Judge Chengalpet pending disposal of the above Civil Revision Petition. For Appellant(s): Mr.AR.L.Sunderesan Senior Advocate for Mr.Rishab Narayanan S https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CMP No. 3907 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4
ORDER The second respondent herein filed a suit for declaration of title and injunction against first respondent / Association. The first respondent / Association represents the interest of the plot owners in the layout called “Pearl Beach”. The first respondent filed an application seeking rejection of the plaint and the same was dismissed by the impugned order. The first respondent / Association has not chosen to challenge the same. 2.The petitioner herein who is a member of the first respondent / Association and also owner of a plot in the layout has got interest in the subject matter and if the order impugned in the Revision is allowed to stand, it will have adverse impact on the individual interest of the petitioner. Therefore, the present application has been filed seeking leave. 3.Satisfied with the reasons, leave granted. Registry is directed to number the Civil Revision Petition, if it is otherwise in order. 19-02-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No ep https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CMP No. 3907 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 To:- The Additional District Judge, Chengalpet. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CMP No. 3907 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 S.SOUNTHAR, J. ep CMP No. 3907 of 2026 in C.R.P.Sr.No.24232 of 2026 19-02-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis