GOVIND KUMAR S/O RATANLAL v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
SOSA/730/2025 · 2026-05-04
Bhuwan Goyal, Inderjeet Singh
Criminal Appealbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7120 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7120 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:18749-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Criminal Misc. Bail (Suspension Of Sentence) Application No.730/2025 in D. B. Criminal Appeal No.171/2025 Govind Kumar S/o Ratanlal, R/o Mogra Police Station Bhawanimandi District Jhalawar (Presently Confined In District Jail Jhalawar District Jhalawar) ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rinesh Kumar Gupta, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, Deputy Government Advocate assisted by Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma, Advocate. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 04/05/2026
1. This suspension of sentence application has been filed by the accused-applicant along with the appeal. 2. Counsel appearing on behalf of the accused-applicant submits that the accused-applicant has been convicted and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment for the offence punishable under Section 302/34 IPC. 3. Counsel for the accused-applicant has annexed the certificate under Rule 311 (3) of the Rajasthan High Court Rules to the effect that accused-applicant is in judicial custody. Counsel further submits that the accused-applicant has been falsely implicated in this matter and recovery of knife has been made at the instance of co-accused Raju Lal and no recovery has been made from the accused-applicant. Counsel further submit that the accused-
[2026:RJ-JP:18749-DB] (2 of 2) [SOSA-730/2025] applicant was on bail during trial and the appeal is not likely to be heard in near future. Therefore, he prayed that sentence awarded to the accused-applicant may be suspended and he be released on bail during the pendency of the appeal. 4. Learned Deputy Government Advocate opposed the application for suspension of sentence. 5. We have heard counsel for the parties and perused the record. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the present case, and also considering the fact that the accused-applicant was on bail during trial and no recovery has been effected at the instance of the accused-applicant and hearing of appeal may take long time, we deem it just and proper to allow this criminal miscellaneous suspension of sentence application. 7.
In that view of the matter, this criminal miscellaneous suspension of sentence application is allowed and it is ordered that execution of sentence awarded to the accused-applicant shall remain suspended during the pendency of the criminal appeal and the accused-applicant be admitted to bail subject to satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before this Court on 03.07.2026 and thereafter as and when called upon to do so. 8. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax for necessary compliance. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J Tushar/20