Subhan Alam @ Aryan @ Shubhan Alam v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./13383/2026 · 2026-04-29
Sandeep Kumar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7118 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7118 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13383 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-60 Year-2025 Thana- KURLIKOT District- Kishanganj ====================================================== Subhan Alam @ Aryan @ Shubhan Alam S/o Saidur Rahman R/o Village - Kowabhitta, Ward No. 19, P.S - Kurlikot, District - Kishanganj ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 13386 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-61 Year-2025 Thana- KURLIKOT District- Kishanganj ======================================================
1. Tehsin Reza @ Tahsin Raza S/o Saidur Rahman R/o Village - Kowabhitta, Ward No. 19, P.S - Kurlikot, District - Kishanganj
2. Sajid Alam S/o Saidur Rahman R/o Village - Kowabhitta, Ward No. 19, P.S - Kurlikot, District - Kishanganj ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 13383 of 2026) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dilip Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jagdhar Prasad (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 13386 of 2026) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dilip Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Zainul Abedin ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 4 29-04-2026 These cases arise out of the same P.S. Case i.e., Kurlikot P.S. Case No. 61 of 2025; therefore, they are being heard together and disposed of by a common order.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13383 of 2026(4) dt.29-04-2026 2/2
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this application.
4. Permission as prayed for is granted.
5. Accordingly, both these applications are dismissed as withdrawn.
Shishir/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T