ADEEBA HASHMI v. VIVEK KUMAR YADAV, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE COMMISSIONERATE AND ANOTHER
CAPL/5227/2026 · 2026-09-17
Vikas Budhwar
Contempt Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7118 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7118 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 5227 of 2026 Court No. - 53 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant.
2. The present contempt petition has been preferred alleging non-compliance of the order passed in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 52588 of 2014 ( Razeena Bano & Another Vs. State of U.P. and 3 others) reported in (2015) (2) ADJ 2323.
3. Today instructions have been produced dated 15.09.2026 appending therewith an FIR lodged on 13.09.2026 being FIR No. 00483.
4. The said fact has not been disputed by the learned counsel for the applicant. Let a copy of the instructions be served upon the learned counsel for the applicant.
5. Accordingly, the contempt application stands consigned to record.
6. Instructions have been filed today is taken on record and marked as Appendix-A. September 18, 2026 N.S.Rathour Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ambuj Kumar Mishra, Vineet Kumar Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Adeeba Hashmi .....Applicant(s) Vivek Kumar Yadav, Deputy Commissioner Of Police Commissionerate And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- NIPENDRA SINGH RATHOUR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad