[2026:RJ-JP:20985] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 493/2026 Harish Chhapoliya S/o Shri Kashi Prasad, Age About 29 Years, R/o Ward No. 10, Near Bissau Gate, Ramgarh Setha, Police Station Ramgarh Sethan, District Sikar (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Fatehpur Sikar) ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4414/2026 1. Yogesh S/o Chouthmal Gurjar, Aged 41 Years, R/o Jav Ka Mohalla, Ramgarh Shekhawati, District Sikar Rajasthan. (At Present In Confined In Sub Jail Fatehpur Shekhawati District Sikar). 2. Mukesh Chandoliya S/o Nandkishore, Aged 34 Years, Jav Ka Mohalla, Ramgarh Shekhawati, District Sikar Rajasthan. (At Present In Confined In Sub Jail Fatehpur Shekhawati District Sikar). ----Accused Petitioners Versus State of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Non-Petitioner S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7208/2026 Ravi Choudhary Alias R.K. Jakhar S/o Maniram, Age 30 Years, R/o Neema Ki Dhani, Police Station Ramgarh Sethan, District Sikar. At Present In Sub Jail, Fatehpur. ----Accused Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through The PP ----Non Petitioner For Petitioner(s) : Dr. Shivendra Singh Rathore Mr. Rajesh Maharshi with Mr. Susheel Pujari Mr. Jaswant Singh Rathore [2026:RJ-JP:20985] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-493/2026] For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP Mr. Prakash Chand, SHO, Ramgarh Sethan, District Sikar HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 19/05/2026 1. These bail applications have been filed on behalf of the accused-petitioners under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 181/2025 registered at Police Station Ramgarh Sethan, District Sikar for the offence(s) under Sections 61(2), 111(2)(b), 111(3), 111(4), 117(2), 118(2), 308(4), 351(2), 351(3) of BNS and under Sections 66, 66C, 66D, 66F of IT Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case; that the accused-petitioners are behind the bars since long; that the trial is at the fag end; that most of the witnesses have been examined and Investigating Officer is the last witness to be examined and for that purpose the case is scheduled for 25.05.2026 in Trial Court; so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioners behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accused-petitioners may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused- petitioners and submits that there are criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioners and this case pertains to committing organized crime in order to extort money. He further submits that the accused-petitioners have been working as crime [2026:RJ-JP:20985] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-493/2026] syndicate in an organized manner. Investigating Officer of the present case is physically present and submits that he himself is the last witness in this case and the case is scheduled for 25.05.2026 in Trial Court. Therefore, looking to the seriousness of the allegations levelled against this case, accused-petitioners may not be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and the arguments advanced by both the parties that the trial is at the fag end; that there are four other criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner Harish, Five against the accused-petitioner Yogesh, seven against the accused- petitioner Mukesh and four criminal cases are pending against the accused-petitioner Ravi; the allegations against the accused- petitioners in this case is that they are working as crime syndicate in an organized manner to deter the persons in order to extort money and in this case Investigating Officer is the last witness to be examined and that is scheduled for 25.05.2026. Hence, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, does not deem it fit to entertain the bail applications at this stage. 5. Accordingly, the present Criminal Misc. Bail Applications are dismissed. 6. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail applications and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 7. However, learned Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J KAVISH /4-6