Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7113 (GAU)

Sh. Rosiamliana Ralte v. The State of Mizoram

Bail Appln./43/2026 · 2026-05-31

Sanjeev Kumar Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/4 GAHC030003762026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./43/2026 Sh. Rosiamliana Ralte S/o Sangthanga Ralte(L), R/o Maubawk-I, Aizawl, Mizoram VERSUS The State of Mizoram Aizawl Advocate for the Petitioner : Ms. Lalngaihsaki Fanai Advocate for the Respondent : P.P./Addl.PP, Mizoram B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER 01.06.2026 Heard Ms. Lalngaihsaki Fanai, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mrs. Mary L. Khiangte, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. This is an application filed under Section 483 BNSS for grant of bail to the accused/applicant, namely Shri. Rosiamliana Ralte, in connection with Excise Case No. N-141/26 under Section 21(a) & 20(b) (ii) A of ND&PS Act. Page No.# 2/4 3. A bail application being Bail Appln. No. 33/2026 filed by the petitioner before the learned Special Court, ND&PS Act, Aizawl has been withdrawn by the petitioner as reflected in the Order dated 24.05.2026 passed by the said learned Court. 4. The petitioner was arrested on 17.05.2026 and although no copy of the FIR has been annexed to the instant writ petition, a copy of the General Diary/Receipt has been annexed as Annexure V to the instant bail petition. It appears that there are other accused persons besides the petitioner and different quantities of different types of contraband were allegedly recovered from them. It further appears that as far as the present petitioner is concerned, 4 gms of yellowish powder suspected to be Heroin and 87 gms of dried leaves suspected to be Ganja was seized from her possession which come under the category of small quantity. 5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Mrs. Mary L. Khiangte does not dispute the authenticity of the Annexure V document and concedes that as per the said document, the quantities mentioned come under the category of small quantity. 6. As already held by this High Court, the offences attracted in respect of small quantities of Narcotics Drugs & Psychotrophic Substances are bailable in Page No.# 3/4 nature. In the present case, the case have been registered under Section 21(a) & 20(b) (ii) A of ND&PS Act, both of which pertain to small quantity. 7. In view of the above, the offences appear to be bailable. 8. Considering the above, the prayer for bail is allowed. 9. Accordingly, the above-named petitioner is allowed to go on bail of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) only with two sureties of like amount subject to the satisfaction of the learned Special Court, ND&PS Act, Aizawl/Trial Court with following conditions: i) That the petitioner shall not hamper with the investigation, or tamper with the evidence of the case. ii) That the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer. iii) That the petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail. Page No.# 4/4 10. Petition stands allowed and disposed off. JUDGE Comparing Assistant