SUSRI SUSMITA SWAIN @ SUSMITA SWAIN v. STATE OF ODISHA
ABLAPL/3305/2026 · 2026-04-27
Aditya Kumar Mohapatra
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7111 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7111 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page 1 of 2.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No.3305 of 2026 Susri Susmita Swain @ Susmita Swain ..... Petitioner
Represented by Adv. - Gyana Ranjan Mahapatra -versus- State of Odisha ..... Opposite Party
Represented by Adv. – UC Jena, A.S.C.
CORAM:
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA
ORDER 27.04.2026
Order No.
01.
1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode).
2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State. Perused the records.
3. This is an application under Section 482, BNSS filed by the Petitioner for anticipatory bail, involving offence punishable under Sections 3(5), 351(2) and 296 of the BNS in G.R Case No.307 of 2026 of the Court of learned SDJM, Berhampur arising out of Berhampur Town P.S Case No.55 of 2026.
4. On perusal of the record it appears that all the offences alleged are bailable in nature. In such view of the matter, this Court is of the view that the present Anticipatory Bail Application is not maintainable as there is no apprehension of arrest.
Page 2 of 2.
5. At this juncture, learned counsel for the Petitioner produced a copy of order dated 21.04.2026 passed in ABLAPL No.2138 of
2026.
6. Taking note of all the aforesaid facts, this Court is of the view that there exists no apprehension of arrest.
7. Accordingly, the ABLAPL stands disposed of.
Urgent certified copy of this order be granted as per rules.
( A.K. Mohapatra)
Judge Anil
Designation: Junior Stenographer