Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7108 (ALL)

RAJNISH KUMAR v. STATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

NA528/38055/2026 · 2026-09-16

Saurabh Srivastava

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 38055 of 2026 Court No. - 79 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for parties. 2. This present application has been filed for seeking quashing of Non-Bailable Warrant dated 30.5.2026 passed in Case no. 1488 of 2009 arising out of Case Crime no. 470 of 2008 under sections 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC, PS- Civil Lines, District Etawah. 3. On perusal of the narration of FIR as well as impugned order and chargesheet, this Court does not find it to be a case where interference of this Court is required. No such ground appears to be available in the present application, on the basis of which, impugned order, can be set aside. 4. Accordingly, the prayer sought through the instant application, is refused. 5. Lastly, learned counsel for applicant has submitted that liberty may be granted to applicant to surrender before the court concerned in pursuance to NBW order to which learned AGA has no objection. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the matter, applicant is directed to appear before the learned court concerned in pursuance to impugned NBW order within three weeks from today. Till three weeks from today, no coercive action shall be Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sukesh Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rajnish Kumar .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) initiated against the applicant. After the expiry of aforesaid period of three weeks, learned concerned court is directed to proceed as per law. 7. With the aforesaid observation, the application is disposed of. September 17, 2026 Shaswat NA528 No. 38055 of 2026 2 (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHASWAT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad