Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7107 (KAR)

MR.KISHORE KUMAR v. THE COMMISSIONER

WP/32168/2024 · 2026-03-09

M I Arun

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14029 WP No. 32168 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO. 32168 OF 2024 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN: 1. MR.KISHORE KUMAR AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, S/O. LATE. VEERENDRA SINGH, RESIDING AT NO.215, NETAJI MARG, KEVAL PARK, AZADPUR NORTH, WEST DELHI - 110 033 PRESENTLY CAMPING AT NO.92, 11TH MAIN, KURUBARAHALLI, J.C. NAGAR, MAHALAKSHMIPURAM LAYOUT, BENGALURU - 560 086 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. V.S. SHAM SUNDAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE COMMISSIONER BBMP, BENGALURU - 560 002 2. THE ASST REVENUE OFFICER KODIGEHALLI SUB DIVISION, BBMP, BENGALURU-560 092. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.S. KARTHIKEYAN, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO Digitally signed by GEETHA P G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14029 WP No. 32168 of 2024 QUASH THE ENDORSEMENT VIDE ANNEXURE A DATED 28.02.2024 BEARING NO.BBMP/YAVA/ARO/KSD/PR/23-24 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING / PHYSICAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN ORAL ORDER After arguing the matter for some time, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that certain persons who are claiming rights over the subject property were required to be impleaded as parties to the proceedings, as they are just and necessary parties. However, by mistake the same has not been done and he intends to file a fresh writ petition in this regard, as the present writ petition cannot be amended so as to effectively incorporate the necessary pleadings and parties. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14029 WP No. 32168 of 2024 2. For the aforementioned reasons, the Writ Petition is hereby dismissed as withdrawn, reserving liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh writ petition in accordance with law, if so advised. Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE CH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 32