[2026:RJ-JP:20793] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16258/2025 Rohitash Gehlot Son Of Shri Vijay Singh Gehlot, Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of Chhitam Teela, Gali, Bayana, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan-321401. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Medical And Health, Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. Rajasthan Paramedical Council/rajasthan State Allied And Health Care Council, Plot No.-C-7(A), Sultan House, Sawai Jai Singh Highway, Banipark, Jaipur-302016 Through Registrar. 3. Controller Of Examination, Rajasthan Paramedical Council/ Rajasthan State Allied And Health Care Council, Plot No.-C-7(A), Sultan House, Sawai Jai Singh Highway, Banipark, Jaipur-302016 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Madhukar Shyam Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sankalp Vijay for Mr. Vigyan Shah, AAG Mr. Bharat Saini HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 18/05/2026 1. The present writ petition has been filed invoking the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court enshrined under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the issuance of an appropriate writ, order, or direction to the respondents to permit the petitioner to submit his examination form online and subsequently appear in the ensuing examinations. [2026:RJ-JP:20793] (2 of 3) [CW-16258/2025] 2. In the instant matter, the short issue falling for consideration before this Court pertains to a specific notification/communication dated 01.09.2025, published on the official website of the respondent-Rajasthan Paramedical Council. 3. A bare perusal of the said notification categorically reflects an upper time limit of six years which has been prescribed for a candidate to successfully qualify the requisite examinations. The policy unequivocally stipulates that upon the exhaustion of the said six-year period, no further time or grace period can be granted to any student/candidate to fill the examination form or continue the course. 4. It is an admitted position that the petitioner has failed to clear the examinations and achieve the requisite academic eligibility within the prescribed statutory period of six years. 5. Heard and considered the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the parties. 6. It is a well-settled position of law that the Courts, while exercising its extraordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, possesses a highly circumscribed scope of judicial review in academic matters. It is trite that the Courts ought not to routinely interfere with academic policies and ordinances, especially when such policies squarely pass the touchstone of reasonability and are uniformly applied to maintain the standards of professional education. 7. In the present factual matrix, this Court discerns no facial perversity, arbitrariness, or unreasonableness in the impugned policy of the Rajasthan Paramedical Council that would warrant interference. [2026:RJ-JP:20793] (3 of 3) [CW-16258/2025] 8. In view of the above, no interference is called for. Accordingly, the instant writ petition, being bereft of any merit, stands dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J Shivam/19