UKHC010057202026 2026:UHC:4913 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS BA1 No. 579 of 2026 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Narendra Bali, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. Chitrarth Kandpal, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Ms. Sukhwani Singh, learned counsel for the complainant. 4. The present applicant ‘Jatin @ Bharat’ S/o Shri Parmal is praying for bail in reference to First Information Report dated 05.03.2026 bearing Case Crime No. 84 of 2026, wherein, as many as 12 persons have been implicated including the present applicant for the offences punishable under sections 115(2), 190, 191(2)(3), 333, 351(2), 351(3), 109(1) and 3(5) of BNS, 2023. 5. It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated and the charge-sheet has already been filed for the offences punishable under sections 115(2), 190, 191(2), 333, 351(2), 351(3) and 3(5) of BNS, 2023, therefore, there is no need of further custodial interrogation of the applicant. He submits that no specific role has been assigned to the present applicant and has been implicated only due to previous enemity and rivalry. He submits that all the allegations are general in nature and the present applicant is languishing in jail since 08.03.2026 and the applicant has no previous criminal antecedent. 6. On the other side, learned Brief Holder for the State, submits that after thorough investigation the charge-sheet has been filed after collecting all credible evidence, however, he has not disputed that the charge-sheet has already been filed and there is no need for further custodial interrogation. Apart from this, he submits that the present applicant has no criminal antecedent. 7. Learned counsel for the complainant Ms. Sukhwani Singh submits that the allegations are UKHC010057202026 2026:UHC:4913 very serious in nature, therefore, he does not deserve for bail. 8. After hearing the arguments of learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration that the present applicant is languishing in jail since 08.03.2026 and now the charge-sheet has already been filed, there is no need for custodial interrogation and furthermore, the applicant has no criminal antecedent, therefore, this court is of the view that the applicant deserve for bail. 9. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case the bail application is allowed. 10. Let the applicant ‘Jatin @ Bharat’ be released on bail on furnishing his personal bond and two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 16.06.2026 PR UKHC010057202026 2026:UHC:4913