S/L 12 to 21 24.02.2026 Court No.04 B.K.N C.P.A.N. 648 of 2025 Sanjib Das Vs. Arup Sengupta & Anr. In F.M.A. 407 of 2021 Sanjib Das Vs. State of West Bengal & Ors. With C.P.A.N. 675 of 2025 Madan Chandra Bag Vs. Arup Sengupta & Anr. In F.M.A. 268 of 2021 Madan Chandra Bag Vs. State of West Bengal With C.P.A.N. 681 of 2025 Astu Charan Ghanti Vs. Arup Sengupta & Anr. In F.M.A. 635 of 2020 Astu Charan Ghanti Vs. State of West Bengal & Ors. With C.P.A.N. 687 of 2025 Madhabi Das Vs. Arup Sengupta & Anr. In F.M.A. 406 of 2021 Madhabi Das Vs. State of West Bengal & Ors. 2 With C.P.A.N. 689 of 2025 Ram Prasad Das Vs. Arup Sengupta & Anr. In F.M.A. 389 of 2021 Ram Prasad Das Vs. State of West Bengal & Ors. With C.P.A.N. 692 of 2025 Sanjay Kumar Malik Vs. Arup Sengupta & Anr. In F.M.A. 404 of 2021 Sanjay Kumar Malik Vs. State of West Bengal & Ors. With C.P.A.N. 697 of 2025 Goutam Pakira Vs. Arup Sengupta & Anr. In F.M.A. 646 of 2020 Goutam Pakira Vs. State of West Bengal & Ors. With C.P.A.N. 702 of 2025 Bimal Kumar Ruidas Vs. Arup Sengupta & Anr. In F.M.A. 259 of 2021 Bimal Kumar Ruidas Vs. State of West Bengal & Ors. 3 With C.P.A.N. 705 of 2025 Sukumar Malick Vs. Arup Sengupta & Anr. In F.M.A. 269 of 2021 Sukumar Mallick Vs. State of West Bengal & Ors. With C.P.A.N. 723 of 2025 Radheshyam Das Vs. Arup Sengupta & Anr. In F.M.A. 390 of 2021 Radheshyam Das Vs. State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Subir Sanyal, Sr. Adv., Mr. Biswarup Biswas, Mr. Kamal Mishra, Mr. Pratap Sanfui … for the applicants/writ petitioners. Mr. Biswabrata Basu Mallick, Mr. Biman Halder Mr. Amman Arif Ansari … for the Alleged Contemnor No. 2/D.P.S.C, Hooghly. 1. We have heard the learned senior advocate representing the applicant as well as the learned advocate representing the D.P.S.C, Hooghly. 2. The learned advocate for the D.P.S.C, Hooghly has filed a report in the form of affidavit wherein there is a specific averment that the petitioners have obtained less than the cut off marks (38.0772). The marks obtained by all the applicants are disclosed in a list of appellants containing the total score obtained by the applicants. The list contains the marks of all the applicants which 4 we have found to be below 38.0772. The petitioners were awarded the following marks: 1. Sanjib Das ---- 36.006 2. Madan Chandra Bag ---- 34.906 3. Astu Charan Ghanti ---- 33.272 4. Madhabi Das ---- 35.361 5. Ram Prasad Das ---- 33.122 6. Sanjay Kumar Malik ---- 33.967 7. Goutam Pakira ---- 33.389 8. Bimal Kumar Ruidas ---- 35.200 9. Sukumar Malick ---- 32.044 10. Radheshyam Das ---- 25.594 3. Having found such situation transparently emerging from the list filed alongwith the compliance report we were inclined to close the contempt proceedings. 4. The learned advocate, however, appearing for the applicants sought an opportunity to file an exception. Thereafter, an exception was filed. 5. Today when the matter is taken up, the learned senior advocate submits that the cut off marks which has been made the basis of excluding the petitioner is cut off marks for the General Category; and there is no publication of the panel. 6. We invited the learned senior advocate to substantiate such submission with reference to averments made in the exception filed. Having gone through the same, he is not in a position to show that any such averment is 5 made in the exception regarding cut off for General Category being made the basis to exclude the present applicants who is a member/s of Schedule Caste Category. 7. The directions contained in the order, contempt of which is alleged was to prepare a merit wise panel and include all candidates if they are found having obtained more marks than cut off marks. Exercise having completed and list enclosed with the affidavit of compliance, there is no scope for proceeding further in the contempt proceedings. 8. We, however, leave it open to the writ petitioners to agitate any grievance with reference to their disqualification, in appropriate proceeding in accordance with law, if so advised. 9. The contempt application/s is dismissed. 10. Urgent Photostat Certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all necessary formalities. (Madhuresh Prasad, J.) (Prasenjit Biswas, J.)