Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7099 (GAU)

SRI RUPAK KUMAR RAY AND ANR v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

AB/946/2026 · 2026-05-24

Parthivjyoti Saikia

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010088232026 2026:GAU-AS:7182 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/946/2026 SRI RUPAK KUMAR RAY AND ANR SON OF LATE MAHESH CH. RAY RESIDEN TOF VILL- MOTHERJHAR, P.O. MOTHERJHAR, P.S. GOLAKGANJ, DIST. DHUBRI, ASSAM. 2: SMTI. JYOTIKA RAY WIFE OF SRI RUPAK KUMAR RAY RESIDENT OF VILL- MOTERJHAR P.O. MOTERJHAR P.S. GOLAKGANJ DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B B GOGOI, MRS. S KHATANIAR Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER Date : 25.05.2026 1. Heard Mr. B. B. Gogoi, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. P. Borthakur, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam. 2. The Police report as sought for has been received. 3. The report shows that no criminal case has been registered against the petitioners, Sri. Rupak Kumar Ray and Smt. Jyotika Ray. 4. The report further shows that one non-FIR case has been registered against them vide Golakganj P.S. non-FIR Case No.194/2026. 5. The report of the Investigating Officer shall form a part of the record. 6. Since, no criminal case has been registered against the petitioners, this anticipatory bail application stands closed and disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant