APHC010662002025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] TUESDAY, THE 28th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3525/2025 Between: 1. PASAM SUBBA LAKSHMI, W/O LATE P.SRINIVASA RAO, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, RESIDING AT DNO.56-10-49, P AND T COLONY- 3, SACHIVALAYAM STREET, PATAMATA, VIJAYAWADA-520010. ...PETITIONER AND 1. AKKULA SRIKANTH REDDY, S/0 VENKATESWARLI, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS. 2. AKKULA VIJAYAKANTH REDDY, S/O VENKATESWARLU, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS. REP BY HIS GPA HOLDER AKKULA VENKATESWARLU, S/O SINGA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS. BOTH ARE RESIDING AT DNO. 54-14/3-11, BANK COLONY III, SRINIVASA NAGAR,VIJAYAWADA-520008 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to aggrieved by Order dated 10- 11-2025 in I.A.No. 166 of 2025 in O.S No. 156 of 2025 on the file of the Court of the II Additional Senior Civil Judge at Vijayawada IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of Order dated 10-11-2025 passed in I.A.No. 166 of 2025 IN O.S No. 156 of 2025 on the file of the Court of the II Additional Senior Civil Judge At Vijayawada, pending disposal of the above Revision petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VM CHIRANJEEVI KOLLA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. N A RAMACHANDRA MURTHY The Court made the following: ::ORDER :: The above civil revision petition was filed aggrieved by the order dated 10.11.2025 passed in I.A.No.166 of 2025 in O.S.No.156 of 2025 on the file of the learned II Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Vijayawada. 2. Today, when the matter is taken up, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the suit was disposed of on 09.03.2026. Hence, the cause in the civil revision petition does not survive for adjudication and the same has become infructuous. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 28.07.2026 TVN Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No 87 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3525 of 2025 Date: 28.07.2026 TVN