Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7097 (HP)

ANIL KUMAR v. STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

EX.P./371/2026 · 2026-03-16

Jiya Lal Bhardwaj

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:HHC:7367 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA Execution Petition No.371 of 2026 Decided on: 16 th March, 2026 ___________________________________________________________________ Anil Kumar ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others ...Respondents _____________________________________________________________________ Coram Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioner: Mr. Vishal Thakur, Proxy Counsel. For the respondents: Mr. Sikander Bhushan, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 3. Mr. Tek Ram Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.4. Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Sikander Bhushan, learned Deputy Advocate General and Mr. Tek Ram Sharma, learned counsel, appear and waive service of notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3 and 4, respectively. 2. Learned Deputy Advocate General has produced a 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 copy of letter dated 13.03.2026 issued by the Deputy Conservator of Forests, Palampur Forest Division, Palampur, H.P. and a copy of ofÏce order dated 02.03.2026 passed by Principal Chief Conservator of Forests (HoFF), Himachal Pradesh, Shimla-1. The same are taken on record. 3. A perusal of the communication dated 13.03.2026 reveals that the pension case of the petitioner has been prepared and sent to the OfÏce of Account General, H.P. Shimla on 13.03.2026 for its approval. 4. Learned counsel for respondent No. 4 assures this Court that the pension case of the petitioner will be approved within a period of three weeks from today. 5. Since the mandate contained in the judgment dated 14.05.2025, passed in CWP No.9031 of 2024, titled, Anil Kumar vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others, has been complied with, the execution petition is rendered infructuous. However, it is made clear that in case the needful in terms of 3 the aforesaid communication dated 13.03.2026, is not done by respondent No.4 within three weeks, the petitioner shall be at liberty to seek revival of the present execution petition. 6. In view of the above, the present Execution Petition is accordingly disposed of. 16 th March, 2026 ( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) (ankit) Judge