Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 70957 (MAD)

MLS Business Centre India Private Limited v. P.K.S.Prashanth

CRP/968/2026 · 2026-02-26

S Sounthar

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRP No. 968 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 26-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR CRP No. 968 of 2026 MLS Business Centre India Private Limited Having office at K-4, Sical Race View Apartments, No.2, Race Course Road (Interior), Guindy, Chennai - 600032. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. P.K.S.Prashanth, S/O. Kuppu Reddy, No.4, (Old No. 60), Pet House, Kuppu Arcad, Venkatnarayana Road, T.Nagar, Chennai – 600017. 2. P.J.K.Sairam, S/O. Kuppu Reddy, No.4, (Old No. 60), Pet House, Kuppu Arcad, Venkatnarayana Road, T.Nagar, Chennai - 600017. 3. J.N.Ramji Alias Jahath Ramjee S/O. Jagadeesan, No.4, (Old No. 60), Pet House, Kuppu Arcad, Venkatnarayana Road, T.Nagar, Chennai - 600017. 4. T.Kannan, Fathers name not known, No.4, (Old No. 60), Pet House, Kuppu Arcad, Venkatnarayana Road, T.Nagar, Chennai - 600017. ..Respondent(s) __________ Page1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP No. 968 of 2026 Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India to fix a time frame directing the VII Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai to complete the trial, and to dispose of OS.No.2225 of 2019 within the stipulated time period fixed by this Court. For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.Murali for M/S. R. and P. Partners ORDER This Civil Revision petition has been filed seeking a direction to the Trial Court to dispose of the suit in O.S.No.2225 of 2019, within a time frame, fixed by this court. 2. The petitioner herein /plaintiff filed the above said suit seeking recovery of advance amount paid under rental arrangement. It is seen from the A diary abstract filed in the typed set of papers that the pleadings of the parties were completed as early as on 21.06.2023 and thereafter, the matter was posted for filing proof affidavit by the plaintiff. Subsequently, due to pendency of the interlocutory applications, the suit has not been taken up for trial. It is seen from the A diary extract that even today, two interlocutory applications are pending in I.A.No.2 and 3 of 2023. __________ Page2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP No. 968 of 2026 3. Taking into consideration that the suit was of the year 2019 and the pleadings of the parties were completed as early as in June 2023, this court is inclined to direct the trial court to dispose of the suit in O.S.No.2225 of 2019 as expeditiously as possible. 4. With the above direction, this civil revision petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. 26-02-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No MST To The VII Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai. __________ Page3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP No. 968 of 2026 S.SOUNTHAR, J. MST CRP No. 968 of 2026 26-02-2026 __________ Page4 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis