Page No.# 1/2 GAHC020002472024 2026:GAU-NL:324 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : WP(C)/80/2024 SMTI. LOLANO JOHN NGULLIE AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, DAUGHTER OF LATE ETSENYIMO JOHN NGULLIE, R/O HOUSE NO. 159, BANK COLONY, DIMAPUR-797112 VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 2 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110001 2:THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (AU)-1(1) DIBRUGARH STATION-DIMAPUR NAGALAND 3:THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX WARD-28(1) RANGE-28 DELH Advocate for the Petitioner : SENTIYANGER, CHUBA IMCHEN,KONLI BUCHEM,V ANNE THERIE Advocate for the Respondent : CGSC, BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH Page No.# 2/2 Advocates For the petitioner : Sentiyanger For the respondent: Suman Chetia, SC, Income Tax O R D E R 02.06.2026 Heard Mr. Sentiyanger, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Suman Chetia, the learned Standing Counsel for the Income Tax Department. 2. Mr. Sentiyanger, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as the petitioner had already filed an appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Authority, against the Assessment Order dated 19.02.2024, the petitioner herein would not like to further pursue the instant proceedings. He, however, submitted that the withdrawal of the instant petition should not prejudice the petitioner in the appeal so filed before the Appellate Authority or in further pursuing other remedies available under law. 3. Taking into account the above, the instant writ petition stands closed on withdrawal. It is observed that the withdrawal of the instant petition would not prejudice the petitioner in the appeal filed before the Appellate Authority as well as in pursuing other available remedies provided under the Income Tax Act, 1961. 4. Interim order passed earlier stands vacated. JUDGE Comparing Assistant