Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7095 (CHH)

BHAGAT RAM MANJHI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/1893/2026 · 2026-04-21

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:18341 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1893 of 2026 1 - Bhagat Ram Manjhi S/o Shri Manat Ram Manjhi Aged About 60 Years R/o Village- Bijari, Gram Panchayat Patrapali, Tahsil- Gharghoda, District- Raigarh (C.G.) Presently Reisded At - Vill. Kurmibhauna, Tahsil- Gharghoda, District- Raigarh (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, New Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, Distt.- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Collector District- Raigarh (C.G.) 3 - The Sub Divisional Officer (Rev.) Sub Division Gharghoda, District- Raigarh (C.G.) 4 - The Sub Registrar Office Of The Sub Registrar, Tahsil- Gharghoda, District- Raigarh (C.G.) 5 - The Tahsildar Tahsil- Gharghoda, District- Raigarh (C.G.) 6 - Birbal Bhagat S/o Shri Nand Kishore Bhagat Aged About 42 Years Caste - Uraon, R/o Police Line Hudco Colony, Ward No. 03, Raigarh, Tahsil And District- Raigarh (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) (Cause Title is taken from CIS System) For Petitioner : Mr. A. N. Bhakta, Advocate For State : Mr. Shreyansh Mehta, Panel Lawyer Digitally signed by SHAYNA KADRI 2 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 22/04/2026 1. After arguing the matter for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file an appropriate application before the competent authority, assailing the sale deed which, according to him, has been executed without obtaining prior permission of the Collector as required under Section 165(7)(b) of the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code, the petitioner being a member of an aboriginal tribe. It is further alleged that the said transaction is vitiated by fraud on the part of respondent No. 6. 2. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the petition is disposed of as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Shayna Judge