ALWAR SAHAKARI BHOOMI VIKAS BANK v. BADRI PRASAD (DECEASED) S/O SUWALAL,
CRES/994/2024 · 2026-03-19
Sandeep Taneja
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 709 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 709 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:11847] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Restoration Application No. 994/2024 in S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.1170/2020 Alwar Sahakari Bhoomi Vikas Bank, Branch Rajgarh, Alwar ----Applicant-Appellant Versus
1. Badri Prasad (Deceased) S/o Suwalal, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Raini, Tehsil Rajgarh District Alwar. 1A. Mu. Gulab Beba Badri Prasad, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Village Raini, Tehsil Rajgarh District Alwar. 1B. Ramsingh S/o Badri Prasad, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village Raini, Tehsil Rajgarh District Alwar. 1C. Vishram S/o Badri Prasad, Aged About 14 Years, R/o Village Raini, Tehsil Rajgarh District Alwar. 1D. Uganti D/o Badri Prasad Minor Through Bali Mother Khud R/o Village Raini, Tehsil Rajgarh District Alwar. 1E. Bane Singh S/o Badri Prasad, Minor Through Bali Mother Khud Mu. Golab Beba Badiri Prasad, R/o Village Raini, Tehsil Rajgarh District Alwar.
2. Bhawan Sahay S/o Suwalal, R/o Village Raini, Tehsil Rajgarh District Alwar.
3. Buddha Ram S/o Suwalal, R/o Village Raini, Tehsil Rajgarh District Alwar.
4. Radheyshyam S/o Ramkaran, R/o Boochpuri, Tehsil Rajgarh, District Alwar Rajasthan.
5. Ramkaran S/o Bala Ram, R/o Boochpuri, Tehsil Rajgarh, District Alwar Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Saini For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA
Order 19/03/2026
1. Matter comes up on an application (CMCC No.1978/2024) filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, for condonation of delay in filing the restoration application.
[2026:RJ-JP:11847] (2 of 2) [CRES-994/2024]
2. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. Delay in filing the restoration application, is condoned.
3. Heard on restoration application.
4. The instant application has been filed for restoration of S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.1170/2020, which was dismissed in default by this Court vide order dated 14.02.2024.
5.
Learned counsel for the applicant-appellant submits that earlier, Mr. Naval Singh Sikarwar was engaged as counsel in the miscellaneous appeal but unfortunately, he expired during pendency of the appeal, therefore, no one could appear before the Court to argue the matter on the date fixed for hearing and the miscellaneous appeal was dismissed in default vide order dated 14.02.2024 passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court.
6.
Learned counsel for the applicant-appellant further submits that the applicant wants to contest the appeal on merits, therefore, the application be allowed and the appeal be restored to its original number.
7. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.1170/2020 is restored to its original number.
8. Office to proceed.
(SANDEEP TANEJA),J SAHIL SONI /44