SHARVARI D/O. SUDHIR NARNAWRE v. SMT. AMITA PILLEWAR, JOINT COMMISSIONER AND VICE PRESIDENT
CP/352/2026 · 2026-09-08
Contempt Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7085 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7085 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 / 2 107.cp352.2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 352 OF 2026 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 5682 OF 2026 SHARVARI D/O. SUDHIR NARNAWRE VS SMT. AMITA PILLEWAR, JOINT COMMISSIONER AND VICE PRESIDENT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders
Court's or Judge's Orders. or directions and Registrar's orders. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ms. Hemani Kavi, Advocate for petitioner.
CORAM : URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE AND RAJ D. WAKODE, JJ.
DATE : 08.09.2026
Heard Ms. Kavi, the learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner has invited our attention to the order dated 27.07.2026 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.5682 of 2026 and submits that the respondent – Committee, in spite of specific directions given by this Court for deciding the caste claim of the petitioner within one month from the date of the order i.e. 27.07.2026, has not decided the caste claim of the petitioner.
3. The perusal of the entire petition including the annexures and pleadings reveals that the petitioner has Prity
2 / 2 107.cp352.2026 not issued the legal notice pointing out such willful and deliberate contempt on the part of the present contemnors Nos.1 to 4. The officers of the respondent – Committee are made party respondents in personal capacity as they will be required to face the punishment of imprisonment if ultimately this Court comes to a conclusion that there is a willful and deliberate contempt on the part of the present contemnors. However, the petitioner has not issued any legal notice to them in their personal capacity pointing out such contempt and directly has filed the present contempt petition.
4. In view of above, Ms. Kavi, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that she will withdraw the present contempt petition and then will issue notice to the respondents/contemnor pointing out such contempt. If the contemnors do not obey the order of this Court even after receipt of the contempt notice, the petitioner shall always be at liberty to approach this Court in a contempt jurisdiction.
5. In view of above, the contempt petition is
disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. (Raj D. Wakode, J.) (Urmila Joshi-Phalke, J.) Prity Signed by: Mrs. Prity Gabhane Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 09/09/2026 10:31:24