Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7085 (AP)

Ayapati Yellamma, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/12852/2021 · 2026-07-29

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010225952021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY, THE 30th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 12852/2021 Between: 1. AYAPATI YELLAMMA,, W/O. RENATI VENKATA SUBBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/O. H.NO. 36/323-27-10, SRI NAGAR COLONY, PUTLAM PAILI ROAD, CHINNACHOWK, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE KADAPA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order or direction declaring the action of the 2nd Respondent herein in partly demolishing the drainage channel constructed in place of my compound wall as the drain/dirt water entering the house and further trying to demolish the same completely on the eastern side of the house bearing No. 36/323-27-10 situated Sy.No.634 and 635, measuring an extent of Ac.0.05 1/2 Cents of Chinnachowk, Kadapa, YSR Kadapa District., as arbitrarily, illegal, unjust, unreasonable, without authority, against the principles of natural justice and order passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP. No.10904 of 2021 and consequently direct the 2nd Respondent not to demolish any further of the 2 drainage channel on the eastern side of my house bearing No.36/323-27- 10situated in Sy.No.634 and 635, measuring an extent of Ac. 0.05 1/2 Cents of Chinnachowk, Kadapa, YSR Kadapa District., and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay of all further proceedings including demolition of drainage channel on the eastern side of house bearing D.No. 36/323-27-10 situated in Sy.No.634 & 635, measuring an extent of Ac. 0.05 1/2 Cents of Chinnachowk, Kadapa, YSR Kadapa District., pending disposal of the Writ Petition before this Hon'ble Court Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S DILIP JAYA RAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. KALAVA SURESH KUMAR REDDY ( SC FOR MC RAYAL REGION, NELLORE) 2. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 12852 of 2021 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication and the matter has become infructuous. In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:30.7.2026 RSD 4 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 12852 of 2021 Date: 30.07.2026 RSD