Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7082 (UTT)

RANDHEER SINGH v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSS/1602/2026 · 2026-06-17

Pankaj Purohit

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010105822026 2026:UHC:4982 1 HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition Service Single No. 1602 of 2026 17 June, 2026 Randheer Singh --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand and Others --Respondents ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Presence:- Mr. Akshay Pradhan, learned counsel for petitioner. Mr. G.S. Negi, learned Additional C.S.C. for the State of Uttarakhand/respondent Nos.1 to 3 and 5. Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. (Oral) By means of the present writ petition, petitioner has challenged the impugned transfer order dated 11.06.2026 issued by respondent No.3- Director, Technical Education, Uttarakhand, qua the petitioner, whereby, he was transferred from Government Polytechnic, Bhalswagaj, District Haridwar to Government Polytechnic, District Rudraprayag. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for petitioner that petitioner, who is presently serving as Workshop Instructor, has now been relieved today and the relieving order is sent to him through Whatsapp by the respondent No.5-Principal, Government Polytechnic, Bhalswagaj, District Haridwar. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner on the merits of case contends that mother of petitioner is unwell, and therefore, he should not be transferred from Haridwar to Rudraprayag. UKHC010105822026 2026:UHC:4982 2 4. This Court, having considered the contentions raised by learned counsel for petitioner, is not convinced to interfere with the transfer order. More particularly, the transfer is exigency of the service and petitioner has already been relieved by the respondent No.5. Thus, no interference is warranted. 5. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed in-limine. 6. Pending application also stands disposed of. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 17.06.2026 PN