Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 708 (CAL)

ARPITA GANGULY NEE GHOSH v. SUMIT GANGULY

CO/1000/2024 · 2026-03-19

Shampa Dutt Paul

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

19.03.2026 Ct. No. 30 SL No.01 MKP CO 1000 of 2024 Arpita Ganguly (nee Ghosh) Vs. Sri Sumit Ganguly Mrs. Arundhati Banerjee Mr. Kaustav Banerjee Ms. Ria Kundu ……..for the Petitioner Name not supplied ……….for the O.P. 1. The Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not willing to proceed with the revisional application, as there is an amicable settlement has been arrived between the parties, out of the Court and the petitioner herein has received part of the settlement amount. 2. On hearing the petitioner, who is also present in Court in person today, the revisional application is disposed of as withdrawn. 3. Applications, if any, connected thereto stand disposed of consequently. 4. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 5. Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties on priority basis upon compliance of all formalities. [Shampa Dutt (Paul). J]