[2026:RJ-JP:19213] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4740/2026 Smt. Guddi Devi W/o Late Shri Mangti Singh, Aged About 56 Years, R/o Village Rewadpura Bagren, Fair Price Shopkeeper, Gram Panchayat Bagren, Tehsil Bayana, Police Station Sadar Bayana, District Bharatpur. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajani Kant For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 06/05/2026 1. Apprehending his arrest in connection with FIR No.8/2026 registered at Police Station-Sadar Bayana, District-Bharatpur for the offences under Sections 3 and 7 of Essential Commodity Act, 1955, the petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 482 BNSS. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is a lady. He further submits that the allegation against her is not related to non-distribution of wheat to the entitled beneficiaries, either in time or otherwise. In compliance with the order dated 07.04.2026, the petitioner has joined the investigation, as is evident from the report submitted by the concerned SHO. As per the said report, no [2026:RJ-JP:19213] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-4740/2026] custodial interrogation is required, and the petitioner is willing to join and cooperate with the investigation as and when required. Hence, the anticipatory bail of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application; however, he has not refuted the fact that no custodial interrogation of the petitioner is required. It is also not disputed that no recovery remains to be effected from the petitioner. 5. Considering the nature of allegations and the fact that the petitioner has joined the investigation of the case but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it just and proper to allow the anticipatory bail application of the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 482 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that in the event of arrest of the petitioner-Smt. Guddi Devi W/o Late Shri Mangti Singh, she shall be released on bail on her furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall make herself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade her from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and [2026:RJ-JP:19213] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-4740/2026] (iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/76