- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10181 WP No. 12057 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 12057 OF 2024 (GM-AC) BETWEEN: SBI GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. NO 3/1, RUKMINI TOWERS, PLAT FORM ROAD, DIAGONALLY OPP. TO MANTRIMALL, SHESHADRIPURAM , BENGALURU - 560 020. REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER REGISTERED UNDER COMPANIES ACT 1956 MR ANANDA M (EMPLOYEE ID - 16106) MACT AND LITIGATION CLAIMS EXECUTIVE …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRADEEP B., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. KIRAN H G AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS S/O GANGANNA, R/AT SADASHIVANAGARA, HEBBUR VILLAGE, HEBBUR HOBLI, TUMKUR TALUK AND DISTRICT - 572120 2. S.K. GANGA W/O S.T. GOVINDAIAH AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10181 WP No. 12057 of 2024 R/AT SIDDANAYAKANA PALYA, HEBBUR HOBLI, TUMKUR TALUK AND DISTRICT - 572120 …RESPONDENTS THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER AS PER ANNEX-E DATED 31.01.2024 PASSED BY THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM TUMAKURU ON IA FILED UNDER ORDER VII RULE 11 OF CPC READ WITH SECTION 166(3) (AMENDMENT ACT 2019) IN MVC NO. 671/2023 AND ALLOW THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER AS PER ANNEX-E AND HOLD THAT CLAIM PETITION AS PER ANNEX-A IS NOT MAINTAINABLE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10181 WP No. 12057 of 2024 ORAL ORDER This petition is by the Insurer who is called upon to answer a claim under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [for short, 'the Act'] in the claim petition in MVC No.671/2023 on the file of the Additional Senior Civil Judge and CJM, Tumakuru [for short, 'the Tribunal']. The petitioner has filed an application under Order VII Rule 11[d] read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 contending that the claim petition cannot be entertained because it is filed beyond six months from the date of accident. The Tribunal, by the impugned order dated 31.01.2024, has rejected the petitioner’s application. The question: whether a claim petition filed beyond six months from the date of the accident can be entertained is pending with the Apex Court in SLP Nos.8412-8413/2023 and similar matters in the writ petition in WP [Civil] No. 166/2024 and connected - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10181 WP No. 12057 of 2024 matters. It remains undisputed that the Apex Court by its interim order dated 16.12.2025 has observed that the pendency of the writ petitions/special leave petitions before it shall not come in the way of the claim petitions being adjudicated by the Tribunals but with the stipulation that judgments shall not be finalized. This Court is of the considered view that with the afore-stipulation, this petition must be disposed of observing that the Tribunal's impugned order will be subject to the outcome in the pending matters before the Apex Court. With this arrangement, the inquiry into the merits of the claim petition will continue, but the Tribunal will refrain from pronouncing its judgment and award so that the decision on the merit of the claim petition otherwise will be subject to the Apex Court’s decision on the afore question. - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10181 WP No. 12057 of 2024 The petition stands disposed of accordingly. SD/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE nv List No.: 4 Sl No.: 13