Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 70748 (MAD)

V.R.G. Raj Mohan v. V.R.G. Duraairaj

A/961/2026 · 2026-02-26

P Dhanabal

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

A No. 961 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 26-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL A No. 961 of 2026 AND CS SR NO. 22410 OF 2026 V.R.G. Raj Mohan S/o.V.R.Ganesan, No.20/49, Pandaram Street, Ground Floor, Previously known as Pookara Street, Vadapalani, Chennai 600 026. ..Applicant(s) Vs 1. V.R.G. Duraairaj, S/o.V.R.Ganesan, 2. V.R.G.Ravishankar S/o.V.R.Ganesan Both at No.20/49, Pandaram Street, First Floor, Previously Known as Pookara Street, Vadapalani, Chennai 600 026. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: This application has been filed grant leave to the applicant/plaintiff to institute the above suit before this Court in respect of Schedule B of the suit property. For Applicant(s): Mr.T.T. Ravichandran https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A No. 961 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER This application has been filed to grant leave to the applicant/plaintiff to institute the above suit before this Court in respect of Schedule ‘B’ of the suit property, which is situated outside the jurisdiction of this Court. 2. According to the applicant, he is the plaintiff in the main suit for partition and separate possession as against the defendants. The ‘A’ schedule property is situated within the jurisdiction of this Court and ‘B’ schedule property is situated outside the jurisdiction of this Court, therefore, the applicant has come up with the present application. 3. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and perused the entire documents placed on record. 4. Considering the above said reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the application and taking note of the fact that ‘A’ schedule property is situated within the jurisdiction of this Court and substantial part of cause of action arose within the jurisdiction of this Court and the fact that the ‘B’ schedule property is situated outside jurisdiction of this Court, therefore, it is appropriate to allow the present application. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A No. 961 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 5.Accordingly, the present application is allowed. Registry is directed to number the suit, if it is otherwise in order. 26-02-2026 Neutral Citation: Yes/No DN https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A No. 961 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 P.DHANABAL J. DN A No. 961 of 2026 AND CS SR NO. 22410 OF 2026 26-02-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis