Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 70719 (MAD)

C. Chitra v. The Superintending Engineer

WP/6093/2026 · 2026-02-20

P T Asha

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 6093 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 20-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA WP No. 6093 of 2026 and WMP No.6594 of 2026 C. Chitra W/o. Chinnaiyan, No.33, Periyar Street, Nehru Nagar, Velacherry, Chennai 600 042. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Superintending Engineer TANGEDCO, Chennai 2. The Executive Engineer (O and M) TANGEDCO, Adyar, Chennai. 3. The Assistant Electrical Engineer, Velachery West, TANGEDCO south zone II, Chennai 600 042 4. S. Saroja, W/o Late Subramani, No.33, Periyar Street, Nehru Nagar, Velacherry, Chennai 600 042. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of certiorari calling for the records relating to the impugned notice issued by the 3rd respondent dated 20.01.2026 in Ka.No.Uu.Po.E and Pa Valachery West KK No.387/25-26, quash the same. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 6093 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 For Petitioner(s): Mr.R.Rajadurai For Respondent(s): Mr.L.Jai Venkatesh, Standing Counsel For R1-3 ORDER The petition has been filed by the petitioner to call for the records relating to the impugned notice issued by the 3rd respondent dated 20.01.2026 in Ka.No.Uu.Po.E and Pa Valachery West KK No.387/25-26, quash the same. 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the even according to the respondent he has submitted the reply to the impugned notice on 27.01.2026 in person and through RPAD on 31.01.2026. The reply which has been sent through RPAD has been received by the respondent on 02.02.2026, for which there is no response till date. Therefore, the petitioner is before this Court. 3. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record. 4. Considering the relief now sought for by the petitioner, this Court, without going into the merits of the case, directs the respondents to consider the same and pass appropriate speaking orders, within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 6093 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition stands closed. 20-02-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No ssa To 1.The Superintending Engineer TANGEDCO, Chennai. 2.The Executive Engineer (O and M) TANGEDCO, Adyar, Chennai. 3.The Assistant Electrical Engineer, Velachery West, TANGEDCO south zone II, Chennai 600 042. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 6093 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 P.T.ASHA, J. ssa WP No. 6093 of 2026 20-02-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis