Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7071 (GAU)

LUKASH ORANG @ LUKAS ORANG v. SAIFULLAH HAQUE AND 2 ORS.

CRP(IO)/153/2026 · 2026-05-24

Kalyan Rai Surana

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010079652026 2026:GAU-AS:7217 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : CRP(IO)/153/2026 LUKASH ORANG @ LUKAS ORANG S/O LATE JUNASH ORANG, R/O VILL- KOPATI T.E., P/O- KOUPATI, P/S- ROWTA, DISTRICT- UDALGURI, BTR (ASSAM). PIN CODE-784113 VERSUS SAIFULLAH HAQUE AND 2 ORS. S/O NUR MAHAMMAD ALI, R/O VILL- DAKHIN CHUBA (DHANSIRI), P/O- DHANSIRI BAZAR, P/S- ORANG, DISTRICT- UDALGURI, BTR (ASSAM). PIN CODE- 784114 2:MUKTAR ALI S/O AJIJUL HAQUE R/O VILL- BARANGA BARI P/O-JANGALPARA P/S- DALGAON DISTRICT- DARRANG ASSAM. PIN CODE- 784116 3:THE BRANCH MANAGER IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ADITYA TOWER 1B FIRST FLOOR G.S. ROAD DISPUR GUWAHATI- 78100 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR R S CHAUHAN, MR. W RAHMAN Advocate for the Respondent : , Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA ORDER Date : 25.05.2026 Heard Mr. R.S. Chauhan, learned counsel for the petitioner. As the objection by the insurance company, which is referred to in the impugned order has not been annexed, owing to suppression of material facts, this application stands dismissed, however, with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh application, if so desired by annexing all the relevant documents. JUDGE Comparing Assistant