GAJANAN S/O KISANRAO BHADKE v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. CHIEF SECRETARY, GENERAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, MUMBAI AND ORS.
PIL/68/2026 · 2026-09-08
Public Interest Litigationbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7071 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7071 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
112.pil.68.26 1/2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.68 OF 2026 Gajanan s/o Kisanrao Bhadke VS State of Maharashtra and ors. ______________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's order and Registrar's orders. Mr. S.G. Malode, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Rao, AGP for the State.
CORAM : ANIL S. KILOR AND R
AJNISH R. VYAS
, JJ.
DATE : 08 .09.2026
At the outset, learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that he has instructions not to press prayer clause (i), at this stage.
2. As regards prayer clauses (ii), (iii) and (iv) and other prayer clauses are concerned, he submits that he has not approached the concerned authorities and has filed the present petition. He, therefore, submits that he will raise his grievance before the competent authority.
3. In that view of the matter, as far as prayer clause (i) is concerned, it is not pressed at this stage and we direct that the present petition, except prayer clause (i), be treated as a representation and same shall be decided by respondent Nos.2 and 3 in accordance with law, expeditiously.
4. A copy of the order passed today and the memo of 2026:BHC-NAG:11916-DB
112.pil.68.26 2/2 writ petition be produced before respondent Nos.2 and 3 within two weeks from today.
5. The petition is disposed of accordingly.
(RAJNISH R. VYAS, J.) (ANIL S. KILOR, J.) *Divya Signed by: Mrs. Divya Baldwa Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 08/09/2026 19:52:30