IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11733 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1383 Year-2025 Thana- NAGAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Chandan Kumar S/O Late Ram Sagar Patel @ Ram Sagar Patel village/Town- Kahar Toli, P.S.- Town Hajipur, Dist-Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Aniket Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jagdhar Prasad, APP For the Informant / : Mr. Jaspal Rana, Advocate Complainant ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 4 29-04-2026 Heard Mr. Aniket Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Jaspal Rana, learned counsel for the informant/complainant and Mr. Jagdhar Prasad, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since 15.12.2025 in connection with Hajipur Town P.S. Case No. 1383 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 27.11.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023. 3. According to prosecution case, this petitioner along with other accused persons have committed fraud with the informant/complainant by taking loan amount in her name. It is further alleged that this petitioner has linked his phone number Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11733 of 2026(4) dt.29-04-2026 2/3 with the Aadhar Card of the informant/complainant. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. The allegation as alleged in the FIR/complaint petition is false and fabricated and the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR/complaint petition. From perusal of the FIR/complaint petition it appears that the informant/complainant has not mentioned the specific date and time of the alleged occurrence and the amount in question is the loan amount and she has filed false case against the petitioner and the petitioner has no concern at all with the present occurrence. 5. The learned counsel for the informant/complainant as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor have vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that it has come during investigation that the petitioner misused the OTP of the informant/complainant and it has come in paragraph no. 35 of the case diary that the petitioner has linked his phone number with the Aadhar Card of the informant/complainant which suggest that the petitioner is involved in the present crime in question. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11733 of 2026(4) dt.29-04-2026 3/3 I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail in connection with Hajipur Town P.S. Case No. 1383 of 2025 pending in the court of learned CJM, Vaishali at Hajipur. 7. Prayer is refused. Vanisha/- (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) U T