[2026:RJ-JP:18765] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6042/2026 1. Anoop Kumar Sihag S/o Ramji Lal Sihag, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village Anandpura, Post Kant, Tehsil Malsisar, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. 2. Narender Nain S/o Birbal, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Village Dholas, Post Khirwa, Tehsil Laxmangarh, District Sikar, Rajasthan. 3. Suman D/o Bhagirath Bhaskar, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Village Charano Ki Dhani, Post Parsrampura, Tehsil Nawalgarh, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. 4. Anju Kumari D/o Surendra Kumar, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Bibipur Chhota, Via Roru Bari, Tehsil Fatehpur, District Sikar, Rajasthan. 5. Ashok Kumar S/o Kajor Mal, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Vpo Jasrasar, Sikar, Rajasthan. 6. Manju Saharan D/o Udami Ram, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Village Mana Ram Ki Dhani, Post Niradhnu, Tehsil Malsisar, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, School Education Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Elementary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 3. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini, Adv. with Mr. Aamir Khan, Adv. For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 04/05/2026 [2026:RJ-JP:18765] (2 of 3) [CW-6042/2026] 1. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners applied pursuant to advertisement dated 16.12.2022 published by the Rajasthan Staff Selection Board for appointment on the post of Teacher Grade-III Level-II. 2. After participating in the process, as per law, all the petitioners were selected by the respondents and accordingly, vide orders dated 13.08.2025, 14.08.2025 and 17.01.2025, even proposed districts were allotted for appointment to the petitioners. Thereafter, the petitioners have been waiting for the appointment order; yet respondents have not issued any appointment order to appoint the petitioners in the respective districts by giving postings at a particular school, whereas similarly situated persons have already been appointed by the respondents. 3. Learned counsel submits that as per the petitioners, their candidatures have not yet been rejected by the respondents, nor have they been communicated any reasons whatsoever for not issuing appointment order despite their selection. 4. Learned counsel further submits that thus, under the aforesaid circumstances, where despite selection, the petitioners have been deprived of appointment and the similarly situated persons as well as the persons who were lower in merit, have already been appointed, the petitioners have been left to suffer failure of justice at the hands of respondents. 5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the record. 6. In the aforesaid circumstances and as per the facts stated in the memo of writ petition, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of this writ petition at this stage with directions [2026:RJ-JP:18765] (3 of 3) [CW-6042/2026] to the Director, Elementary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner to take a decision with regard to granting appointment to the petitioners on the post of Teacher Grade-III Level-II pursuant to the District allotment orders issued in respect of petitioners, within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and in case, there is any cogent reason for denying appointment, speaking order shall be passed within the aforesaid period and shall also be communicated to the petitioners. 7. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case. 8. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of. (ANAND SHARMA),J Jatin /6