KIRANPREET KAUR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRWP/3903/2026 · 2026-04-06
Manisha Batra
Public Interest Litigationbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7067 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7067 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRWP-390
IN 175
KIRANPR
STATE OF
CORAM:
Present: MANISHA
1.
Constitutio official resp at the han representati
2.
submitted 04.04.2026 raising thei not yet bee submitted t directions a to decide 3903-2026 (O&M) (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUN AT CHANDIG
ANPREET KAUR AND ANOTHER
Versus
TE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS AM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE
****
Ms Himani Kapila, Advocate f Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. D
ISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL)
The present petition has been titution of India seeking issuance of a ial respondents No.2 to 3 to protect the e hands of respondents No.4 to sentation dated 04.04.2026 (Annexure
At the very outset, learned itted that the petitioners have rec 2026 before the Superintendent of P g their grievances as mentioned in the et been considered and no action ha itted that at this stage, the petitioners tions are issued to respondent No.2-Su ecide the aforesaid representation fi F PUNJAB AND HARYANA NDIGARH
CRWP-3903-2026 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 06.04.2026 THER ...Petitione ersus ...Responden ICE MANISHA BATRA
ocate for the petitioners , Sr. DAG, Punjab s been filed under Article 226 of th ce of a writ of mandamus directing th tect the life and liberty of the petitione to 5 and to take action on the nexure P-3). arned counsel for the petitioners ha e recently filed a representation o nt of Police, Ferozepur (Annexure P in the present petition but the same ha ion has been taken thereon. He furth ioners would be satisfied if appropria Superintendent of Police, Ferozepu tion filed by the petitioners and tak
.2026 titioners ondents
of the ting the titioners n their ers has tion on ure P-3) ame has further riate rozepur nd take AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.06 18:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.
CRWP-3 necessary a
3.
4.
on behalf o in due cour the course o
5.
commentin
disposed of aforesaid re within a p accordance petitioners,
order to pro
06.04.2026 Amit Sharma Whe Whe
3903-2026 -2- ssary action thereon.
Notice of motion.
Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. D ehalf of the respondents-State and sub e course. Let a complete set of the pap ourse of the day.
In view of the limited prayer enting anything on the merits of t sed of at this stage with a direction said representation dated 04.04.2026 in a period of 15 days from today, rdance with law. Needless to say, ioners, the official respondents would p r to protect their life and liberty. .2026
Whether speaking/reasoned Ye Whether reportable Ye , Sr. DAG, Punjab, has advance notic d submits that the needful will be don the paperbook be supplied to her durin rayer made by the petitioners, witho ts of the case, the present petition ction to respondent No.2 to decide th .2026 (Annexure P-3) of the petitione oday, by passing a speaking order say, if any threat is found to th ould provide them adequate security
(MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE
Yes/No Yes/No
e notice be done during without tition is cide the titioners
order in to the curity in AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.06 18:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.