Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7065 (CHH)

CHANDRAMANI RAJWADE v. SOUTH EASTERN COALFIELD LIMITED

WPS/4339/2022 · 2026-04-16

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:17602 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4339 of 2022 1 - Chandramani Rajwade D/o Late Sampuran Rajwade Aged About 40 Years R/o Village Imlipara, Bhatgaon, District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - South Eastern Coalfield Limited Through - Chairman-Cum-Managing, Director, South Eastern Coalfield Limited, Seepat Road, Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Director Personal South Eastern Coalfield Limited, Seepat Road, Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3 - General Manager South Eastern Coalfield Limited Bhatgaon, District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Sub Area Manager South Eastern Coalfield Limited Kalyani Sub Area, District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Shri Aditya Tiwari, Advocate. For Respondents : Shri Sudhir Bajpai, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 17.04.2026 NIRMALA RAO 2 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following reliefs:- “10.1 That, this Hoin'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to grant compassionate appointment to the petitioner in the respondent department in lieu of her father, who died during the service period. 10.2 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief, as it may deem-fit and appropriate.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the father of the petitioner, who was working in the post of Foreman under the respondents, died in harness on 5.7.2012. He would contend that the mother of the petitioner had died prior to the death of his father. He would contend that the petitioner applied for compassionate appointment on 5.7.2022 but till date, no decision has been taken. 3. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondents would submit that till date, the petitioner has not applied for grant of compassionate appointment, and therefore, no decision has been taken in this regard. 4. Heard. 5. Taking into consideration the above-discussed facts, this petition is disposed of reserving liberty in favour of the petitioner to submit an application for grant of dependent employment within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The respondent authorities shall decide it strictly in accordance with the prevailing policy within a further period of 90 days. 3 6. With the aforesaid observation(s), this petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Nimmi