[2026:RJ-JP:21531] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 17183/2025 Naresh Chand S/o Shri Ramcharan, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Ishapur Katara, P.s. Nadbai, District Bharatpur. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pankaj Datt For Respondent(s) For Complainant : : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP Mr. Balvinder Singh HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 21/05/2026 1. Apprehending his arrest in connection with FIR No.323/2025 registered at Police Station-Nadbai, District-Bharatpur for the offences under Sections 318(2) and 316(2) of BNS, 2023, the petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 482 BNSS. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the matter pertains to a financial transaction. Though an FIR has been lodged against the present petitioner alleging that he induced the complainant, Girdharsingh, to pay an amount of Rs.2,50,000/- on the promise of securing recruitment to the post [2026:RJ-JP:21531] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-17183/2025] of Animal Attendant (pashuchar), in fact, the father of the complainant had taken a loan from the petitioner and, when the amount was demanded back, the present FIR came to be lodged on false and concocted grounds. He submits that the petitioner and the complainant have now amicably settled their dispute by way of compromise and the complainant no longer wishes to pursue the case. In support of his submissions, learned counsel for the petitioner has placed on record a compromise deed, which is taken on record. He further submits that the petitioner is ready and willing to cooperate with the investigation. Hence, the anticipatory bail of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned counsel for the complainant has not refuted the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner and submits that he has no objection if bail is granted to the petitioner. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 6. Considering the nature of allegations and the fact that the petitioner has joined the investigation of the case but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it just and proper to allow the anticipatory bail application of the petitioner. 7. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 482 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that in the event of arrest of the petitioner-Naresh Chand S/o Shri Ramcharan, he shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- [2026:RJ-JP:21531] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-17183/2025] (i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade his from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J 86/Arun