Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7062 (JHR)

PANKAJ YADAV @ KARY YADAV @ PANKAJ SUKHDEO YADAV v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./3389/2026 · 2026-04-23

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:11955] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.3389 of 2026 ------ Pankaj Yadav @ Karu Yadav @ Pankaj Sukhdeo Yadav, aged about 28 years, Son of Sukhdeo Yadav, Resident of Village- Dawarpahri, P.O. & P.S.- Birni, District- Giridih. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Vijay Kr. Roy, Advocate For the State : Ms. Amrita Kumari, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-23-04-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Jamua P.S. Case No. 04 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 25(1-B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was in illegal possession of three live cartridges while the co-accused namely Vijay Saw was in illegal possession of one country-made pistol loaded with magazines containing three live bullets. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 06.01.2026 as mentioned in para-9 of the instant bail application. It is further submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 22.04.2026 passed in B.A. No. 3250 of 2026. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Giridih in connection with Jamua P.S. Case No. 04 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 23.04.2026 Saroj/