Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:19089-DB
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1612 of 2026 1 - Sarita Thakre W/o Shri Ajay Thakre Aged About 44 Years R/o Imlipara, Near Old Bus Stand , Ward 24, Bilaspur Tah. And District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 2 - Sheik Moinuddin S/o Shaikh Nababuddin Aged About 53 Years R/o Ward No. 13, Khan Badi, Gali No. 2, Taiba Chowk Talapara, Bilaspur, Tah. And District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 3 - Dilip Kumar Ahirwar S/o Charu Ram Ahirwar Aged About 46 Years R/o 42, Dabripara Chingraj Road, Bilaspur Tah. And District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 4 - Vijay Thakre S/o Ramesh Rao Thakre Aged About 46 Years R/o Imlipara, Near Old Bus Stand, Ward 24, Bilaspur Tah. And District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 5 - Bajrang Lal Gupta S/o Shri Mewa Lal Gupta Aged About 50 Years R/o Ward Number 14, Kalika Nagar, Tifra, Bilaspur Tah. And District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 6 - Kalyan Das Vaid S/o Chiman Lal Vaid Aged About 65 Years R/o Ward Number 17 In Front Of Jagat Agency Teli Para Bilaspur Tah. And District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 7 - Sanjay Thakre S/o Ramesh Rao Thakre Aged About 44 Years R/o Imlipara, Near Old Bus Stand Ward 24, Bilaspur Tah. And District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 8 - Ajit Singh Chhabara S/o Shri Rawel Singh Aged About 76 Years R/o Near Punjabi Colony, Dayal Band Bilaspur Tah. And District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 9 - Sinder Kaur Chhabra W/o Shri Ajit Singh Chhabra Aged About 72 Years R/o Shop Number 6, Imlipara, Near Old Bus Stand , Ward No. 24 Bilaspur Tah. And District- Bilaspur (C.G.) RAHUL JHA Digitally signed by RAHUL JHA Date: 2026.04.25 18:39:27 +0530
2 10 - Satish Vaswani S/o Shri Chela Ram Vaswani Aged About 56 Years R/o Hn 380, Jhulelal Ward , Ward Number 13, Nagar, Panchayat, Bodari Bilaspur Tah. And District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 11 - Vaishnavi Thakre D/o Vijay Thakre Aged About 20 Years R/o Imlipara, Near Old Bus Stand, Ward No. 24, Bilaspur Tah. And District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 12 - Nahid Equbal W/o Shri Sajid Perweiz Aged About 45 Years R/o 16/226, Ward No. 16, Tarbahar Paani Tanki Ke Paas, Indra Colony, Bilaspur Tah. And District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 13 - Satyendra Singh Hora S/o Surjit Singh Hora Aged About 46 Years R/o Gurudwara Ke Samne Sadar Mohalla Sirgitti, Bilaspur Tah.
And District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 14 - Manisha Tiwari W/o Ajay Tiwari Aged About 46 Years R/o Ward No. 21, Civil Lines, Mahila Thana Ke Paas Nirala Nagar, Bilaspur Tah. And District- Bilaspur (C.G.)
. Petitioner(s) Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Urban Administration Department, Mahanadi Bhavan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Collector, Bilaspur District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 3 - The Municipal Corporation , Bilaspur Through Its Commissioner, Bilaspur District- Bilaspur (C.G.)
Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. M.K. Sinha, Advocate For Resp No. 1 & 2 : Mr. Shashank Thakur, Addl. Advocate General For Resp. No.3 : Mr. A.S. Kachhawaha, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge
Order on Board
3 Per
Bibhu Datta Guru, J
25/04/2026
1. By the present petition, the petitioners seek quashment of the tender notice dated 15/10/2025 issued for allotment of shops in the newly constructed complex at Old Bus Stand, Imlipara, Bilaspur, and further seek a direction to respondent No. 3 not to allot any shop to the general public without first considering the claim of the petitioners.
2. At the outset, learned counsel appearing for the parties submit that pursuant to the order dated 08/08/2025 passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Sarita Thakre & Others v. Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur & Others {SLP (C) Diary No. 38084/2025}, liberty was granted to the petitioners therein to submit a representation to the respondents for allotment of suitable space for carrying on their business. It is submitted that, in pursuance thereof, the present petitioners have submitted their representation, which is still pending
consideration, and therefore, a direction may be issued to respondent No. 3 to consider and decide the same in accordance with law.
3. In view of the submissions made and without entering into the merits of the case, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 3 to consider and decide the pending representation of the petitioners expeditiously, preferably within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
4. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case, and the concerned authority shall decide the representation
4 independently, in accordance with law, without being influenced by any observations made in this order. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru)
(Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Rahul/Gowri