Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7061 (AP)

TALLURI VENKATA SATYA SUBBA RAO v. PUNATI DHANALAKSHMI

CRP/1943/2024 · 2026-07-27

Subba Reddy Satti

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010374442024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] TUESDAY, THE 28th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1943/2024 Between: 1. TALLURI VENKATA SATYA SUBBA RAO, S/O. PULLA RAO, HINDU, MALE, AGE 48, PALAKOL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. PUNATI DHANALAKSHMI, W/o. Chinna Lakshmayya, Age 56, Female, Hindu, House wife, Palakol, Palakol Mandal, West Godavari District ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to begs to present this Memorandum of Civil Revision Petition having been aggrieved by the Order dated 12-8-2024 passed in I.A.N0.181/2024 in O.S.No.214/2019, on the file of Principal Civil Judge( Junior Division), Palakol, West Godavari District IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings of the suit in O.S.No.214/2019 on the file of the Principal Civil Judge( Junior Division), Palakol, West Godavari District and pasS Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PECHATHY RANGA RAO Counsel for the Respondent: 1. MEDAPATI SANTOSH REDDY The Court made the following: ::ORDER :: The above civil revision petition was filed aggrieved by the order dated 12.08.2024 passed in I.A.No.181 of 2024 in O.S.No.214 of 2019 on the file of the learned Principal Civil Judge (Junior Division), Palakol. 2. As seen from the case details of the aforementioned suit, which was placed on record, pending the revision, the suit was dismissed as not pressed on 30.01.2025. Given the developments, the cause in the civil revision petition does not survive for adjudication and the same has become infructuous. 3. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 28.07.2026 TVN Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No 91 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1943 of 2024 Date: 28.07.2026 TVN