ARATIKATLA @ PEDAPALLI VENKATE RAMANA v. ARATIKATLA THYAGARAJU
CRP/921/2024 · 2026-07-26
Subba Reddy Satti
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7060 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7060 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010174972024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] MONDAY, THE 27th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 921/2024 Between:
1. ARATIKATLA @ PEDAPALLI VENKATE RAMANA, W/O TYAGARAJU, AGE 51 YEARS, OCC GRADE-II TEACHER TELUGU PANDIT, R/O FLAT NO. 102, ANDE SATYANARAYANA APARTMENTS, ATTILI, ATTILI MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. ARATIKATLA THYAGARAJU, S/o Someswar Rao, Age 62 Years, Occ Astrologer and Goldsmith, R/o R.C.R Peta, Penugonda, West Godavari District
...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to set aside the order dated 05-02-2024 passed In the Court of the Honourable Civil Judge (Senior Division), Tanuku in IA. No.736/2018 in O.P. No. 208/2018 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in O.P. No. 208/2018 pending before The Honourable Civil Judge (Senior Division), Tanuku pending the Civil Revision Petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. D V SASIDHAR Counsel for the Respondent:
1. VANGIPURAPU AASRITHA The Court made the following order:
Heard Sri D.V.Sasidhar, learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. Assailing the order dated 05.02.2024 in I.A.No.736 of 2018 in O.P.No.208 of 2018 on the file of the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Tanuku, the above revision was filed.
3. Pending the revision, O.P.No.208 of 2018 filed by the revision petitioner was dismissed on contest on 26.03.2025.
4. Given the developments pending the revision petition, the cause in the revision petition does not survive.
5. Recording the same, the civil revision petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Dated: 27.07.2026 SNI
115 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.921 of 2024
Dated: 27.07.2026 SNI