Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 706 (CHH)

BEDRAM CHANDRA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

MCRCA/189/2026 · 2026-02-04

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:6607 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRCA No. 189 of 2026 Bedram Chandra S/o Manharan Lal (Wrongly Mentioned As Sahu) Aged About 30 Years , R/o Village Nandali, Police Station Jaijaipur, District Sakti (C.G.) ... Applicant versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer, Police Of Police Station Jaijaipur, District Sakti (C.G.) ... Respondent For Applicant : Shri Ishwar Jaiswal, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Smt. Smriti Shrivastava, PL. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice Order on Board 05/02/2026 1. This first anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed by the applicant, who is apprehending his arrest in connection with Crime No.413/2025 registered at Police Station – Jaijaipur, District GOURI MUDALIAR Digitally signed by GOURI MUDALIAR Date: 2026.02.06 16:08:56 +0530 2 Sakti (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 296, 115(2), 351(3), 221, 132, 121(1), 117(2) Read with Section 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. 2. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that on 30-12-2025, ASI namely Radheshyam Rathore, who is the complainant presently posted at Police Station Jaijaipur lodged written complaint that when he was on duty at Ram-Ram Bhajan Mela, at about 10.30 PM, when he went to close the Orchestra Party, at that time, the applicant along with other persons asked the complainant, what he was doing here and using filthy languages against the complainant, then other police official were trying to stop the applicant then again at about 11.20 PM, when the complainant along with other police officials coming back to the Station House Office, at that time, the applicant along with other accused persons stopped the complainant and police officials and started abusing them and committed marpeet by hand, fist, stick and ring, by which the complainant got injuries and therefore on the basis of written complaint, the FIR has been registered and investigation is going on. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant’s real brother who was the co-accused has already been enlarged on bail by the trial court so far as the applicant is concerned, it is only on account of his relationship he too has been implicated. He would submit that the injury received by the injured who is a police 3 personnel is simple in nature. He would submit that the applicant is ready to abide by all the directions and conditions which may be imposed by this Court while granting bail, the applicant is permanent resident of above mentioned address shown in the cause title and there is no likelihood of his absconding or tampering with prosecution witnesses, therefore he prays to enlarge the applicant on anticipatory bail. 4. On the other hand, learned State counsel, appearing for the non - applicant/State, opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail. She would submit that the applicant has no criminal antecedents. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the materials available on record. 6. Considering the facts & circumstances of the case, submission of learned counsel for the parties, materials available on record, considering the fact that the applicant’s real brother who was the co-accused has already been enlarged on bail by the trial court, also considering the fact that injury received by the injured who is a police personnel is simple in nature and further the fact that applicant has no criminal antecedents, therefore, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the present applicant. 7. Accordingly, the instant MCRCA is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest of the applicant – Bedram Chandra, on executing a personal bond and one surety in the like sum to the 4 satisfaction of the arresting Officer, he shall be released on bail on the following conditions:- (a) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such fact to the Court. (b) The applicant shall not act in any manner which will be prejudicial to fair and expeditious trial. (c) The applicant shall appear before the trial Court on each and every date given to him by the said Court till disposal of the trial. (d) The applicant and the surety shall submit a copy of his adhaar card along with a coloured postcard full size photo having printed the adhaar number on it, which shall be verified by the trial Court. (e) The applicant shall not involve himself in any offence of similar nature in future. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice gouri