Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7059 (PNJ)

DR. HARNAM SINGH MADAN v. SUDHIR RAJPAL IAS AND ANR

COCP/229/2026 · 2026-05-06

Archana Puri

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.110 COCP-229-2026 Date of Decision: 06.05.2026 DR. HARNAM SINGH MADAN ....Petitioner Versus SUDHIR RAJPAL IAS AND ANR .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI Present:- Mr. Sahil Khunger, Advocate for the petitioner. Dr. Neha Awasthi, Addl. A.G. Haryana. ***** ARCHANA PURI, J. (Oral) At this stage, learned State counsel submits that the compliance of order dated 27.11.2025, passed in CWP-33702-2025, has been made and the petitioner has been designated as Professor w.e.f. 20.01.2025. Copy of the order has been supplied, which is taken on record. In view of the aforesaid order, at this strage, counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to pursue with the contempt petition and the same be dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to assail the speaking order, if need arises. Ordered accordingly. (ARCHANA PURI) 06.05.2026 JUDGE Sonu Saini Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : Yes/No HIMANSHU VATS 2026.05.07 09:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document