Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7051 (KAR)

SRI MANJUNATH B P v. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

WP/12945/2025 · 2026-02-26

H T Narendra Prasad

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12117 WP No. 12945 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 12945 OF 2025 (S-RES) BETWEEN: SRI MANJUNATH B P S/O. PILLA ANJANAPPA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS WORKING AS BILL COLLECTOR KANNAMANGALA GRAMA PANCHAYATH DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT R/AT KANNAMANGALA VILLAGE, DEVANAHALLI BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562110. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ANIL KUMAR B O., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ZILLA PANCHAYATH BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION BHAVAN BEERASANDRA VILLAGE, CHAPPARADAKALLU KUNDANA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562 110. 2. THE PRESIDENT KANNAMANGALA GRAMA PANCHAYATH KANNAMANGALA, DEVANAHALLI TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562 110. 3. THE PANCHAYATH DEVELOPMENT OFFICER KANNAMANGALA GRAMA PANCHAYATH Digitally signed by DHANALAKSHMI MURTHY Location: HIGH COURTOF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12117 WP No. 12945 of 2025 KANNAMANGALA, DEVANAHALLI TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-560 067. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.M S DEVARAJU, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS LEADING TO ISSUANCE OF IMPUGNED ORDER / NOTICE BEARING NO. KA. GRA.PUM/ HANADURUPAYOGA VASULATHI /48/2024-25 DATED: 06.03.2025 (ANNEXURE-A) ISSUED BY R-3 AND AFTER PERUSAL TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT OR ORDER QUASHING THE SAME AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD ORAL ORDER This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenging the impugned order dated 06.03.2025, vide Annexure-A, issued by the third respondent for the recovery of a sum of Rs.9,07,703/-. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the third respondent submits that the petitioner has paid the said amount, and therefore, they will not initiate any further action against the petitioner. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12117 WP No. 12945 of 2025 3. In view of the above, the relief sought by the petitioner no longer survives for consideration. Hence, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE CM LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 50