Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7051 (HP)

MOHAMMAD IRSHAD v. PNB

CRMPM/233/2026 · 2026-02-26

Sandeep Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Mohammad Irshad v. Punjab National Bank Cr.MPM No. 233 of 2026 26.2.2026 Present: Mr. Ram Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sanket Sankhyan, Advocate, for the respondent. CrMP No. 233 of 2026 For the reasons stated in the application, this Court is convinced and satisfied that delay in maintaining the accompanying petition is neither intentional nor willful, rather same has occurred on account of circumstances, which were completely beyond the control of the applicant and as such, delay, which has been sufficiently explained, is condoned. The application is disposed of. Cr. Revision No. of 2026 (Cr.RST/11943/25) Be registered. Notice. Mr. Sanket Sankhyan, Advocate, waives service of notice on behalf of the respondent. CrMP No. of 2026 (Cr.MPST/11976/25) Notice in the aforesaid terms. Reply, if any, on or before the next date of hearing. In the meantime, substantive sentence imposed by the learned trial court shall remain suspended, subject to applicant’s depositing 50% of compensation amount and furnishing personal bonds in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- (rupees twenty five thousand only) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court within four weeks. February 26, 2026 (Sandeep Sharma), Manjit Judge