Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7050 (UTT)

DINESH PANWAR v. BASANTI DEVI

WPMS/120/2019 · 2026-06-17

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010007332019 2026:UHC:4984 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/120/2019 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J 1. Mr. Jayvardhan Kandpal, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Himanshu, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Navnish Negi, learned counsel for the respondents. 3. This is tenant’s petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the interlocutory order dated 27.07.2018 passed by Prescribed Authority in proceedings in relation of the building. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has vacated the premises in question, therefore, the relief, as claimed by petitioner in the writ petition, do not survive. 5. In view of the statement so made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J) 17.06.2026 Aswal NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Digitally signed by NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=eacc6757ee7881e933ff8934f07477005a a85f9802a3a08b08d1369512ea30f3, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=44EB54CBF00B7698CB6F10C2CE3 D26F5C22DACF4F4610C1FE58A58531726FBB0, cn=NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Date: 2026.06.17 05:58:53 -07'00' UKHC010007332019 2026:UHC:4984