Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010104182026 2026:GAU-AS:7539 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1746/2026 ABDUL KUDDUS SON OF - OSMAN ALI MANDAL,R/O- VILL.- PALAHARTARI,P.O. AND P.S.- NAGARBERA,DIST.- KAMRUP, ASSAM,PIN- 781127. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY,GOVT. OF ASSAM,DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION ELEMENTARY,DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06. 2:THE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI-19. 3:THE DIRECTOR ASSAM MINORITIES DEVELOPMENT BOARD GANESHGURI GUWAHATI 6 4:THE DISTRICT ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER KARMUP DADARA ASSAM 5:THE BLOCK ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER KAMRUP CHAMARIA BLOCK ASSAM PIN- 781127. 6:THE SECRETARY GOVT. OF ASSAM HOME AND POLITICAL DEPTT. DISPUR GHY-6 7:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE CID ULUBARI GUWAHATI- Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. J DEKA, MS. A TALUKDAR,MR S SARMA Advocate for the Respondent : SC, ELEM. EDU, GA, ASSAM Page No.# 2/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN ORDER Date : 01.06.2026 Heard Mr. S. Sarma, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Ms. B. Deka, learned standing counsel, Elementary Education Department, for the opposite party Nos. 1 to 5; and Ms. D.D. Barman, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate for the opposite party Nos. 6 and 7. This application is preferred by the applicant for correction of the typographical error, that crept in the order dated 10.11.2025, in WP(C) No. 4810/2023 (Abdul Kuddus vs. State of Assam and Ors.). Mr. Sarma, learned counsel for the applicant, by referring to the last part of paragraph No. 2 of the order dated 10.11.2025, submits that the applicant/petitioner had prayed for issuing direction to the respondent authorities to release the 3% D.A. increment which was dropped w.e.f. July, 2021 to 2023; to regularize the service gap period since 04.11.2020 to 07.09.2020; to release the time scale benefit for completion of 10 years of service etc., and that the date i.e. ’07.09.2020’, ought to be have been ’07.09.2022’ instead, and therefore, Mr. Sarma has contended to allow this application by correcting the aforesaid date. Ms. B. Deka, learned standing counsel, Elementary Education Department, for the opposite party Nos. 1 to 5; and Ms. D.D. Barman, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate for the opposite party Nos. 6 and 7 submit that they have no objection in the event of allowing this application. Page No.# 3/3 Accordingly, taking note of the submissions of learned counsel for both the parties, and also considering the facts and circumstances on the record, this Court is inclined to allow this application. It is provided that the date i.e. ’07.09.2020’ appearing in the last part of the paragraph No. 2, of the order dated 10.11.2025, henceforth be read as ’07.09.2022’, for all purposes. In terms of above, this I.A. stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant