Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 / 4
2026:CGHC:17629
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1653 of 2026 1 - Chetan Lal Verma S/o Shri Faggu Ram Verma Aged About 42 Years Presently Working As Peon, Govt. Higher Secondary School, Khaprikala, Block Tilda District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Smt. Jyoti Kaser W/o Rajesh Kaser Aged About 46 Years Presently Working As Peon, Govt. Higher Secondary School, Santoshi Nagar Raipur District- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Chandrahas Kosle S/o Kheduram Aged About 51 Years Presently Working As Peon, Govt. Higher Secondary School, Torla Block Abhanpur District- Raipur (C.G.) 4 - Khemchand Adil S/o Sonsay Adil Aged About 54 Years Presently Working As Peon, Govt. Higher Secondary School, Lalpur, Block Dharsiva District- Raipur (C.G.) 5 - Nohar Lal Koshle S/o Sukalu Ram Koshle Aged About 44 Years Presently Working As Peon, Govt. Higher Secondary School, Tandwa Block Tilda District- Raipur (C.G.) 6 - Om Prakash Shandil S/o Bodhan Singh Shandil, Aged About 49 Years Presently Working As Peon, Govt. Higher Secondary School, Tulsi Newra Block Tilda District- Raipur (C.G.)
2 / 4 7 - Smt. Asmotin Kanwar W/o Shri Moti Lal Kanwar, Aged About 36 Years Presently Working As Peon, Office Of District Education Officer, Raipur District- Raipur (C.G.) 8 - Smt. Indrani Singh W/o Shri Tekan Singh Aged About 42 Years Presently Working As Peon, Govt. Higher Secondary School, Madhi, Block Tilda District- Raipur (C.G.) 9 - Ghanshyam Sahu S/o Sukalu Sahu Aged About 46 Years Presently Working As Peon, Office Of District Education Officer, Raipur District- Raipur (C.G.) 10 - Neelu Ram Verma S/o Somnath Verma Aged About 37 Years Presently Working As Peon, Govt. Higher Secondary School, Sanjay Nagar Raipur District- Raipur (C.G.)
... Petitioners versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Collector, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - District Education Officer, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.)
... Respondents For Petitioners : Mr. N. Naha Roy, Advocate For State : Mr. Hari Om Rai, Panel lawyer S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge
Order on Board 17.04.2026
3 / 4
1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition, seeking following reliefs:-
“10.1 Issue an appropriate writ and direct the respondents to consider the cases of the petitioners for grant of notional seniority on the regular posts of peon since the year 2016, owing to improper denial of regularization from such date contrary to what had been done in the cases of a large number of their contemporaries/similarly situated persons, posted in the Districts of Gariyaband and Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara (CG) as explained above. 10.2 Issue an appropriate writ and direct the respondents to consider the cases of the petitioners for grant of promotion on notional basis to the post of Assistant Grade – III w.e.f. the date the same is done for the candidates in the Districts of Gariyaband and Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara (CG), by treating the petitioners at par with them. 10.3 Grant any other relief, which is deemed fit in the circumstances of the case.”
2. After arguing for sometime, counsel for petitioners submits that as petitioners have submitted representation before respondent no. 03 on 29.01.2024 which is pending consideration since last about two years, therefore, they may be permitted to submit a fresh representation before the concerned authority and in turn direction be issued to the concerned authority to take decision on representation to be submitted by petitioner, at the earliest, within specified time frame.
3.
Learned counsel for State submits that in view of limited prayer made by learned counsel for petitioners, he is having no objection.
4. On due consideration of submission made by learned counsel for respective parties, without commenting any thing on the merits of the case, I find it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition at this stage permitting petitioners to submit a fresh comprehensive representation raising all the grounds as raised in this writ petition before respondent no. 3 and in turn respondent no. 03 is directed to consider and take
4 / 4 decision on representation to be submitted by petitioners, accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a further period of 04 months from the date of receipt of the representation.
5. With the aforesaid observation and direction, this writ petition is
disposed of. Certified copy as per rules. sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Alfiza