Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7050 (ALL)

SUDHIR SHAH v. ANUJ MISHRA AND 3 OTHERS

A227/13009/2026 · 2026-09-17

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13009 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This is a plaintiff's petition. In the suit filed by the plaintiff, an application for grant of temporary injunction was moved, which was allowed by the trial court. According to the petitioner's counsel, the defendants has violated the order of temporary injunction which has led to the filing of an application under Order 39 Rule 2A CPC, which is pending consideration. The sole prayer made is for expeditious disposal of the said application. 2. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, with a direction upon court concerned to decide the Civil Misc. Case No. 10 of 2025 filed under Order 39 Rule 2A CPC, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. 3. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of. 4. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. September 18, 2026 A. V. Singh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Akhilesh Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Sudhir Shah .....Petitioner(s) Anuj Mishra And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AJAY VIKRAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad