Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 705 (CHH)

Jeevan Lal Dehre v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/1202/2026 · 2026-02-03

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:6150 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1202 of 2026 1 - Jeevan Lal Dehre S/o Gaindu Singh Dehre Aged About 47 Years Assistant Teacher (L.B.) Posted At Government Primary School Parpoda, Block- Berla, Distt.- Bemetara, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Capital Complex, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, Distt.- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Director Directorate Of Public Instructions Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, Distt.- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Collector Bemetara, Distt.- Bemetara, Chhattisgarh. 4 - District Education Officer Bemetara, Distt.- Bemetara, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Block Education Officer Berla, Block- Berla, Distt.- Bemetara, Chhattisgarh. 6 - Neeraj Singh Rajput, (B.D.C. Member) Member Of Janpad Area No. 5, Janpad Panchayat Berla, Distt.- Bemetara, Chhattisgarh, At Post Village Parpoda Post Mohbhattha Block Berla, Distt.- Bemetara. ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Dhaniram Patel, Advocate For Respondents-State : Ms. Deeksha Gauraha, Dy. G.A. 2 SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 04 /02/2026 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:- “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the records of the case of the State for kind perusal of this Hon’ble Court. 10.2 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the impugned suspension order dated 10.12.2025 passed by the Respondent No. 4/District Education Officer, Bemetara, District – Bemetara, Chhattisgarh. 10.3 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to continue his service at Government Primary Schhol Parpoda, Block Berla, District – Bemetara with all consequential benefits. 10.4 Any other relief deemed fit in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be granted.” 2. Learned counsel for the Respondent/State raises an objection with regard to maintainability of the writ petition on the ground that the petitioner is having the alternate efficacious remedy of appeal under Rule 23 of the Chhattisgarh Civil Services (Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules, 1966. 3. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition at this stage with liberty to avail the other remedy available under the law. However, he further submits that direction be issued to the appellate authority to take decision on the appeal to be filed by the petitioner within specified time frame. 4. On due consideration of the submission of counsel for the respective parties, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn at this stage, reserving liberty with the petitioner to avail the alternate remedy available under the law. 5. It is also directed to the Appellate Authority to consider and take decision on the appeal to be submitted by the petitioner in accordance with law, 3 expeditiously, preferably within a further period of 45 days from the date of receipt of the appeal. 6. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Dey SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY Date: 2026.02.05 11:36:11 +0530