W.P.No.5798 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 17.02.2026 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN W.P.No.5798 of 2026 and W.M.P.Nos.6315 and 6316 of 2026 Chanduloki Traders Represented by its Proprietor Raman Sampath. ... Petitioner Vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer – 1, (also known as the Deputy Commercial Tax Officer) Krishnagiri – 11 Hosur, Tamil Nadu. ... Respondent Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records on the files of the learned Respondent herein in GSTIN/33BREPS0770F1ZX/2019-20 in Form GST DRC – 08 in Order Reference No.ZD331224257224Q dated 29.12.2024 and quash the same. For Petitioner : M/s.K.Siri Chandana For Respondent : Mrs.K.Vasanthamala Government Advocate 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.5798 of 2026 ORDER Mrs.K.Vasanthamala, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the Respondent. 2. This Writ Petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission itself with the consent of the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the Respondent. 3. In this Writ Petition, the Petitioner has challenged the impugned Order dated 29.12.2024 passed for the tax period 2019-2020, wherein, assessment order dated 08.11.2023 wherein the Petitioner was called upon to appear for personal hearing. However, the Petitioner had not taken advantage of the same and thus, suffered the impugned Order dated 29.12.2024. 4. It is noticed that the limitation for filing an appeal under Section 107 of the respective GST enactments, 2017 against the impugned Order has already expired. The present Writ Petition has been filed only on 02.02.2026. 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.5798 of 2026 5. At this stage, the learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner is willing to pre-deposit the entire disputed tax as a condition for denovo adjudication. 6. The learned counsel for the Petitioner has also made an following endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle which has been extracted hereunder:- “The Petitioner is ready and willing to pay the terms as imposed by this Hon’ble Court for de- novo adjudication of the entire tax liability and undertake to pay.” 7. Under similar circumstances, Orders have been quashed and cases have been remitted back to the Respondent to pass a fresh order on terms subject to such Assessee depositing 25% to 100% of the disputed tax depending upon the length of delay in approaching the Court. I do not find any reason to take a different view in this case. 8. Therefore, to balance the interest of both parties viz., the Assessee and the Revenue, the case is remitted back to the Respondent to pass a fresh order on merits subject to the Petitioner depositing the entire 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.5798 of 2026 disputed tax in cash or from the Petitioner's Electronic Cash Register within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 9. Within such time, the Petitioner shall also file a reply to the assessment order dated 08.11.2023 together with requisite documents to substantiate the case by treating the impugned Order dated 29.12.2024 as an addendum to the assessment order dated 08.11.2023. 10. In case the Petitioner complies with the above stipulations, the Respondent shall proceed to pass a final order on merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of three (3) months of such reply/pre-deposit. Subject to the Petitioner complying with the above stipulations, the attachment of the bank account of the Petitioner if any, shall also stand automatically vacated. 11. It is made clear that bank attachment shall be lifted subject to the Petitioner depositing the entire disputed tax as ordered above and the Petitioner not being in arrears of any other amount for any other tax period barring the amount demanded under the impugned Order. 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.5798 of 2026 12. In case the Petitioner fails to comply with any of the stipulations, the Respondent is at liberty to proceed against the Petitioner to recover the tax in accordance with law as if this Writ Petition was dismissed in limine today. 13. Needless to state, before passing any such order, the Respondent shall give due notice to the Petitioner. 14. This Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above observations. No costs. Connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 17.02.2026 Neutral Citation: Yes / No jas To: The Deputy State Tax Officer – 1, (also known as the Deputy Commercial Tax Officer) Krishnagiri – 11 Hosur, Tamil Nadu. 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.5798 of 2026 C.SARAVANAN, J. jas W.P.No.5798 of 2026 and W.M.P.Nos.6315 and 6316 of 2026 17.02.2026 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis